To a degree, all
writers want to be widely-read, famous authors. Perhaps all writers even have
ambitions like me. Every once in a great, long while, I’ll say something like,
“Yes, such-and-such a thing will happen to me after I write my award-winning novel
which is turned into an Oscar-nominated film, in which I get to act and write
the theme of the music score.”
Of course, I’m joking. Or am I? We all
write for an audience, hoping that it’s a big audience. However, there is a sizable amount of hype about writing for an audience of one: yourself. What
is the balance? What part of art is for us, the writers and creators, and which
part is for the audience?
I’m going to explain a few parts of writing which I enjoy as the writer, without even thinking about the audience.
The part that
the audience doesn't know about: I've already waxed eloquent on the advantages of newspaper poetry, but I have an example of this
“unknown” from a newspaper poem I wrote. The article was actually a
question posed by a person wondering how to best wear the latest style.
The question was boastful; the person proudly lauded his/her personal
youth and beauty and demanded to know how to flaunt the new trend.
Through my
newspaper poem, I turned the columnist’s helpful and kind answer into a
realistic commentary on why pride can pull the wool over someone's eyes when it
comes to physical appearances. Readers of my poem would understand my focus, but they
wouldn't know about the irony behind the blacked-out lines. That’s my own
private smile-maker every time I look at the poem (unless I told my readers,
like I just told you … ironic, right?)
The part where your readers tell you to change something which you know is essential: Recently, I read
a book centering on how we shouldn't be people-pleasers. The book was a
fantastic, deep read with a spiritually-focused line of thinking. I came away
with a better understanding of pleasing God, as well as the understanding that
I can do things that I enjoy without trying to please those who don’t appreciate
or care about those same things. Everybody had unique tastes.
As the writer of your poem/story, you also have
a degree of “omniscience” and “omnipotence.” In a way, you are in control over
everything that happens in your work, and you know what you are going to make
happen (most of the time!) There is no such thing as an omniscient reader. So, the next time someone tells you to change what you
consider a necessary line, just…don’t. Think about it deeply and critically, but if it fits in the end, just … don’t.
The part where
your ideas originate: Over the centuries, readers and critiques discuss how the
author’s personal life is reflected in his/her works. While it is true that the
personal lives of authors surface throughout their stories/poems, nobody really knows where an author’s ideas are
conceived. Sometimes, the author doesn't even know.
One of the silliest
questions an author can be asked is, “Where do you get your ideas from?”
“Um …
from my head?”
In his memoir, On Writing, Stephen King elaborates on how ridiculous this type of question sounds to an author. (Side note: his memoir is a terrific must-read for every writer.) Yes, the idea for The Hunger Games came from flipping channels
between a reality TV show and coverage of the War on Terror, but does that
fully explain the plots, the characters, the strange mix of Romeo and Juliet, dystopian
fiction, “The Lottery,” the love triangle, and the 12 – oopps! I meant
13 – colonies, plus the dozens of other aspects of the books? No way!
Authors are blenders; the delicious (or disgusting)
smoothie of a book that the reader just drank in is the attempted organization of a confused kaleidoscope of years
of thinking and living. The readers don’t get to know all of those interpreted and re-interpreted experiences and thoughts. Those are just yours to enjoy as the writer.
What are some
other ways you enjoy your own writing and the creative process?
